The Three Lenses: The Influence of Literacy Coaches and Observations 

man writing on a blackboard
Photo by fauxels on Pexels.com

The Three Lenses: The Influence of Literacy Coaches and Observations 

When Literacy Coaches observe teachers, most of the time they use set rubrics to determine what the teacher needs to work on and what they are doing well. “Our analysis of the coaches’ discussion about their ratings on the rubrics led us to identify three lenses- or ways of looking- that influences their observations: the pedagogy lens, the responsiveness lens, and the relevancy lens,” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007). What do these lenses mean and how do they affect our teaching and our ability to coach?  

Each time the Literacy Coach watches a lesson and observes how a teacher teaches; they think about how they would have taught that lesson. “Adrian conceptualized a mechanism called a pedagogical lens to help understand how the same teaching might be viewed and interpreted differently by different people (A. Rogers, 2002),” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007). In other words, an English teacher may observe a teacher teaching a lesson on Shakespeare. The observer might have already taught a lesson like this and comes to the observation with their own ideas on how this subject should be taught.  

The observer is analyzing the lesson by seeing how they would have taught it.  

Another lens observers use is called the Responsiveness Lens. “When the coaches in our study discussed rationales for their ratings, they often referred to what we call the responsiveness of teaching as a factor in their analysis,” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007). This means how well the teacher is responding to students. If the subject is too difficult, can the teacher adjust her lesson while teaching to help those students?  

One coach summed up the responsiveness lens nicely, ‘What you’re really looking for is, is she meeting the needs of those kids?” Sometimes the teacher must adjust the lesson to help students. What are the students getting from this lesson? Is the teacher matching what she is reaching to how her students are responding?  

When I started teaching Social Studies, I didn’t realize that some of the terms in the book that were known to most students, were not known to my particular group of students. I had to stop the lesson and go over some vocabulary that I thought was common knowledge.  

Finally, the last lens is called the relevancy lens. Are the students learning from what is being taught? “Their reflections on their retains also dealt with whether they thought students could profit form the teaching; this could only happen if what the teacher was teaching matched what students could use to learn,” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007). The observer questions when teachers are teaching something that is “not meaningful or useful for students, and notes missed opportunities for learning,” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007).  

 Literacy specialist must collaborate with others in their schools. “To be successful, literacy specialist must be able to work collaboratively and cooperatively with teachers, administrators, families and community agencies,” Bean and Goatley (2021). For example, just as I assumed when I started teaching Social Studies that my students should have already known certain vocabulary, Literacy Specialists come equipped with experiences from previous jobs and life experiences. They must also understand the different lens that they observe with and understand how to use those lenses to help teachers and others to becomes the best they can be.  

References 

Bean, R. M., Goatley, V.J. (2021).  The Literacy Specialist. Leadership and coaching for the classroom, school, and community.  4th ed (374 pgs) Guildford Press.  

Rodgers, A., & Rodgers, E. M. (2007). The Effective Literacy Coach: Using Inquiry to Support Teaching and Learning. Teachers College, Columbia University. 

https://books2read.com/u/m25Ygd

Scaffold Teaching and Strategies for Literacy Coaches 

Scaffolding in teaching refers to teachers molding, or demonstrating, how to complete a certain task. After completion of the demonstration, they let their students try to complete the task themselves and only give support as needed. The teacher gradually sheds layers of assistance as the students’ progress. This is the same way Literacy Coaches work with teachers. Scaffolding can be utilized in the classroom with students and by Literacy Coaches when observing and coaching teachers.  

Scaffolding is important in differentiating the education of our students. Some students do not need as much support as others. We give support to those students who need them so they can be at the same level as the other students. In my case study, I am working with a student who experienced difficulty with reading aloud. This student is performing under grade level, where in the past she had been at grade level. She reports that the work has gotten harder. She also reports that she does not do like reading aloud and that she tries to be quick in her reading so it will be over. However, she forgets what she read when she perceives the reading passage is too difficult or long. This particular school system is set up in three trimesters. This student’s grades have decreased from the first trimester to now. She just received grades from the second trimester and is starting the third.  

For this student, I have given more supports than some others. We give her extra allotted time during the day to read with a teacher or support staff. By doing this, we can help her slow down and think about what she is reading. Often, we pause her at a natural stopping point and ask her questions while she is reading. When she reads a longer and larger text, we have been working on teaching her how to take notes, and outline chapters as she reads so she can review them later. This will be help and aid in her education later, as in upper grade levels more reading is required.  

We can see how this works in the classroom with students, but how can we use scaffolding to help teachers? “What became clear to me was the role of active construction on one’s learning and how critical this is on our leading school visit. Scaffolding the teacher through genuine conversation and questioning will provide to be most productive and generative,” (Rodgers & Rodgers, 2007).   

Scaffolding is the support system given to those who need them. This can apply to student as well as teachers. A new teacher might need more support than a veteran teacher. This does not mean that a veteran teacher does not need support, they might been help learning a new technique, or adopting a new teaching philosophy. “We suggest ways in which literacy coaches can think about kind of help they provide teachers, the amount of support they provide, and when to offer help in order to scaffold teacher learning and reach depths of understanding,” (Rodgers & Rodgers, 2007).   

There are things to consider when a literary coach is scaffolding a teacher. However, “The only requirement if a thoughtful coach who creates settings that require active participation and then observes the participation close in order to provide the think of help that is on the teacher’s cutting edge of learning,” (Rodgers & Rodgers, 2007). Coaching is not an opportunity when we just tell someone what they are doing wrong. This is the same way a teacher would give support to their students. We must be mindful of where and how we give support. We should also create a learning environment that is inviting and supportive. 

Scaffolding is a useful tool that can be used in many situations when one person is facilitating the success of another. This can be helping a child learn a chore at home or helping a student work on reading. The key is to remember to create a supportive learning environment.  

References 

Rodgers, A., & Rodgers, E. M. (2007). The Effective Literacy Coach: Using Inquiry to Support Teaching and Learning. Teachers College, Columbia University. 

Strategies of Literary Coaches

low light photography of books
Photo by Suzy Hazelwood on Pexels.com

Strategies of Literary Coaches 

Many professions use reflection in their practice. This includes the profession of Education. Reflective teaching is “an active desire to listen to more sides than one, to give full attention to alternative possibilities, and to recognize the possibility of error even in beliefs that are dearest to us. Teachers who are open-minded are continually examining the rationales that underlie what is taken as natural and right and take pains to seek out conflicting evidence,” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007). This type of practice only works if both parties are open to change. The people involved must be open to new research, new technologies, and new teaching practices.  

 In the preview of teaching, many teachers already use reflection as a normal part of their teaching process. When a teacher plans a lesson, they look through the material they need to teach and “transform the material from a text (typically, although not always, a textbook) into something that can be instructed,” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007). Then the teacher investigates how they can instruct their class, “Instruction requires the teacher to consider how the class, the presentation, and the material will be managed.”  

Once this lesson is complete, the teacher then evaluates the lesson. Teachers review the lesson and how students responded to it. “…the teacher reflects on the whole experience thus far. Reflection can change the way the teacher conceived of the teaching along each stage of the process, form comprehending through transforming teaching and then evaluation,” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007). Reflection is not an extra task, but a necessary part of the teaching process. 

How can a Reading Specialist help teachers with this process? They can help teachers in many ways. First, they can “support the teacher in new comprehensions about instruction along each phase withing the model. It is in this last phase that literacy coaches may be able to take the reflections of teachers and support them in developing new possibilities as to how they might teach their students,” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007). This is a team effort and both parties must be willing to cooperate and have a shared ownership for improvement. “A final rational for coaching reflection is that it is the kind of work that lends itself to exploration through conservation; reflection…,” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007). 

While observing a lesson, coaches should take multiple notes that will help them in the conference with the teacher. These notes have been categorized into five different categories: Hypothetical, Procedural, Methodical, Observational, and Theoretical notes. Using these notes, the coach can refer to things that happened in the lesson. By using open ended questions, they can promote a conversation with the teacher such as, “What evidence do we have that…and do you think…?” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007). Why did that happen? How can we improve on this? “These (questions) gave teachers tacit permission to open up and theorize on the evidence before them as well as their own practices based on their theories.” Rodgers & Rodgers, (2007). 

It is important to look at coaching and reflection to improve and not a way to investigate what the teacher did wrong. Each teacher should approach this process with an open mind so they can improve their profession; no matter how many years they have been teaching or how many certifications they have. The coaches’ job is to help facilitate this growth and empower teachers to want to improve and explore new research, new technologies and new teaching practices. 

References 

Rodgers, A., & Rodgers, E. M. (2007). The Effective Literacy Coach: Using Inquiry to Support Teaching and Learning. Teachers College, Columbia University.